Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Douglas DC-3"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Yes the DC-2 should have its own section , because it is very much different aircraft than the DC-3. In a way, we can compare it as the same case than the DC-9 versus the MD-80, those beeing strictly separated. [[User:Sixcyl|Sixcyl]] 04:59, 19 January 2011 (MST) | Yes the DC-2 should have its own section , because it is very much different aircraft than the DC-3. In a way, we can compare it as the same case than the DC-9 versus the MD-80, those beeing strictly separated. [[User:Sixcyl|Sixcyl]] 04:59, 19 January 2011 (MST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | By the way, we have already 2 samples of DC-2 in films, enough to create the new category DC-2<br> | ||
| + | == Movie:[[ Meet John Doe]] == <br> | ||
| + | == Movie:[[ Kansas City Confidential]] ==<br> [[User:Sixcyl|Sixcyl]] 05:14, 19 January 2011 (MST) | ||
Revision as of 12:14, 19 January 2011
DC-2
Do we need to re-title this page to include the DC-2? Or will the DC-2 have it's own section at some point? Jeremy 18:57, 17 January 2011 (MST)
Yes the DC-2 should have its own section , because it is very much different aircraft than the DC-3. In a way, we can compare it as the same case than the DC-9 versus the MD-80, those beeing strictly separated. Sixcyl 04:59, 19 January 2011 (MST)
By the way, we have already 2 samples of DC-2 in films, enough to create the new category DC-2
== Movie:Meet John Doe ==
== Movie:Kansas City Confidential ==
Sixcyl 05:14, 19 January 2011 (MST)